Am 03.11.2014 um 14:10 schrieb Gerrit Pape:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:15:21PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> From: Michael Biebl
>>
>> Am 23.10.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Adam Borowski:
>>
>>> For now, let's not change packages back and forth. Let's close this
>>> non-issue in rsyslog,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:15:21PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> From: Michael Biebl
>
> Am 23.10.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Adam Borowski:
>
> > For now, let's not change packages back and forth. Let's close this
> > non-issue in rsyslog, it's a problem with the policy.
>
> Agreed.
W
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 02:22:45AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> It's unfortunate that Gerrit objected to this proposed change and
> derailed the discussion.
Well, there's two sides of the medal. Actually I felt that you (plural)
derailed discussion, even before I had chance to start it. That's
Am 23.10.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> This policy requirement is only historic. It made sense when the tools
> couldn't cope with this situation, which was the case more than a decade
> ago. These days, it is actively harmful: it makes debootstrap install junk
> if I exclude systemd (as
This policy requirement is only historic. It made sense when the tools
couldn't cope with this situation, which was the case more than a decade
ago. These days, it is actively harmful: it makes debootstrap install junk
if I exclude systemd (as its dependencies have an elevated priority),
greatly
5 matches
Mail list logo
