Control: tags -1 patch
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:06:57AM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>
> It seems to me we have two issues at play here:
> - auditd violating the adm group convention;
> - apparmor-notify using a suboptimal mechanism to stream auditd logs.
>
> Could we fix the permission
Hi,
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 08:36:44AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 09:55:33 AM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Le 09/05/16 à 21:07, intrigeri a écrit :
> > > in Debian, the convention for many log files is to make them readable
> > > by members of the adm group. We're cons
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 09:55:33 AM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le 09/05/16 à 21:07, intrigeri a écrit :
> > Hi,
>
> Hey,
>
> > in Debian, the convention for many log files is to make them readable
> > by members of the adm group. We're considering doing the same for the
> > auditd logs, in or
Le 09/05/16 à 21:07, intrigeri a écrit :
Hi,
Hey,
in Debian, the convention for many log files is to make them readable
by members of the adm group. We're considering doing the same for the
auditd logs, in order to make apparmor-notify work out-of-the-box.
Shouldn't apparmor-notify use the audi
Hi,
Steve Grubb wrote (09 May 2016 19:33:16 GMT) :
> I can't think of any problems. Just set the log_group = adm in auditd.conf
> and
> fixup the packaging to have that as the group owner. Auditd should create the
> logs with 0640 permissions.
It's good to see that upstream is happy with that
Steve Grubb wrote (09 May 2016 19:33:16 GMT) :
> On Monday, May 09, 2016 09:07:11 PM intrigeri wrote:
>> in Debian, the convention for many log files is to make them readable
>> by members of the adm group. We're considering doing the same for the
>> auditd logs, in order to make apparmor-notify wo
On Monday, May 09, 2016 09:07:11 PM intrigeri wrote:
> in Debian, the convention for many log files is to make them readable
> by members of the adm group. We're considering doing the same for the
> auditd logs, in order to make apparmor-notify work out-of-the-box.
>
> The maintainer of auditd in
Hi,
in Debian, the convention for many log files is to make them readable
by members of the adm group. We're considering doing the same for the
auditd logs, in order to make apparmor-notify work out-of-the-box.
The maintainer of auditd in Debian would like to know what's your take
on it. What kin
8 matches
Mail list logo
