Hi!
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> What am I supposed to do now?
>> Is it a good time for uploading it to unstable?
>
> Yes, you can go ahead.
Uploaded. Thanks.
> BTW please make sure those packages that fail to build have RC bugs reported
> against them.
Here
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 09/11/15 10:17, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream
> on October 15, 2015.
>
> On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded
> to experimental and with the h
Hi again!
I need to follow-up to my previous mail, adding the following info:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> [...]
> * libreoffice_1:5.0.3~rc1-2 => CHECK <= this can be set to OK
> [...]
> * tulip_4.7.0dfsg-2 => FTBFS <= it's a FTBFS (no glew-related)
> [...]
Chee
Dear Release Team,
FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream
on October 15, 2015.
On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded
to experimental and with the huge help (as usual) from Luca Falavigna
(dktrkranz) and his Deb-O-Matic infrastructure
Hi Emilio!
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> So `pkg-config --cflags glew' used to return -I/usr/include/GL in 1.10, but no
> longer does in 1.12.
>
> Since the rest of the packages #include , they can find the header
> just fine. But this package just includes , so
On 02/07/15 09:33, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi Emilio!
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
>>> Hi Jonathan!
>>>
>>> On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire
>>> wrote:
Could you summarise which p
On 02/07/15 09:33, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi Emilio!
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
>>> Hi Jonathan!
>>>
>>> On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire
>>> wrote:
Could you summarise which p
Hi Emilio!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan!
>>
>> On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire
>> wrote:
>>> Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may
>>> be GLEW-r
On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi Jonathan!
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may
>> be GLEW-related?
>
> So, I tested the 11 packages that were failing on 1.11.0 and built them
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> - warzone2100
Upstream have patches for this:
http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/4300
http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/4218
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
Hi Jonathan!
On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may
> be GLEW-related?
So, I tested the 11 packages that were failing on 1.11.0 and built them back
against 1.12.0 and the results are:
* FTBFS but no
On 2015-05-21 11:20, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
Conditions for the package building hasn't changed in this period.
Some of them ftbfs for issues not related to GLEW, others maybe do.
Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may
be GLEW-related?
I've seen that Jonath
Dear Release Team,
FYI, the 1.12.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by
upstream on January 26, 2015... in deep jessie freeze, then.
On May 6, 2015 a first testing-purpose package (followed by another
debian revision fixing few minor issues few days ago) has been uploaded to
experimental
Hi Rene!
On Sep 14, 2014 7:42 PM, "Rene Engelhard" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> > For the record, in the meanwhile I've re-tested those two packages
> > (except for LibreOffice) that were failing due to lack of free space on
> > the machi
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> For the record, in the meanwhile I've re-tested those two packages
> (except for LibreOffice) that were failing due to lack of free space on
> the machinery and they build fine now.
FWIW, LibreOffice also builds fine; tested
Hi!
On 2014-09-08 at 17:52 (CEST), Niels Thykier wrote:
> As mentioned over IRC, the transition freeze has started.
> Accordingly, this transition will be deferred til Jessie +1.
>
> Feel free to ping us about this transition after the freeze.
Good.
For the record, in the meanwhile I've re-test
Control: tags -1 jessie-ignore
On 2014-09-08 15:40, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I'm filing this bug for a new transition of glew package.
>
> [...]
Hi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I'm filing this bug for a new transition of glew package.
On August 11, 2014 the 1.11.0 actual stable version has been released by
upstream.
On August 24, 2014 a fir
18 matches
Mail list logo
