On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:33:13AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I disagree that reusing package names across package types is a nice
> thing to do. I very strongly disagree that it's OK to try that when
> we're close to the freeze (and not at the very beginning of the release
> cycle, where it h
Petter Reinholdtsen (2014-09-11):
> Given that udebs and debs have different name spaces, I do not see any
> problem myself with dropping a name from one namespace and introducing
> it in another, which is what I did when I renamed archdetect to
> archdetect-udeb in the udeb namespace and introduc
[Cyril Brulebois]
> I disagree that reusing package names across package types is a nice
> thing to do. I very strongly disagree that it's OK to try that when
> we're close to the freeze (and not at the very beginning of the
> release cycle, where it hurts less to upload disruptive changes).
Given
Petter Reinholdtsen (2014-09-11):
> [Cyril Brulebois]
> > Of course a failing d-i build means src:debian-installer FTBFS. What
> > else would that be?
>
> Thanks for asking. To me, it could also mean a failing to build a ISO
> with d-i udebs on it. But I had already tested ISO builds, and thus
[Cyril Brulebois]
> Of course a failing d-i build means src:debian-installer FTBFS. What
> else would that be?
Thanks for asking. To me, it could also mean a failing to build a ISO
with d-i udebs on it. But I had already tested ISO builds, and thus
was a bit unsure what was failing for you.
> P
Petter Reinholdtsen (2014-09-11):
> [Cyril Brulebois]
> > I'm not sure why you thought it would be a good idea to mix
> > renaming and reusing udeb/deb package name, but one thing is
> > pretty clear: you never tested a d-i build using those udebs. You
> > would have otherwise noticed the mess you
[Cyril Brulebois]
> I'm not sure why you thought it would be a good idea to mix renaming
> and reusing udeb/deb package name, but one thing is pretty clear:
> you never tested a d-i build using those udebs. You would have
> otherwise noticed the mess you created.
I assume you mean the image build
Cyril Brulebois (2014-09-11):
> Package: archdetect
> Version: 1.100.0.exp.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Petter,
>
> I'm not sure why you thought it would be a good idea to mix renaming
> and reusing udeb/deb package name, but one thing is pretty clear: you
>
Package: archdetect
Version: 1.100.0.exp.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Petter,
I'm not sure why you thought it would be a good idea to mix renaming
and reusing udeb/deb package name, but one thing is pretty clear: you
never tested a d-i build using those udebs. You wou
9 matches
Mail list logo
