control: tag -1 -patch +pending
Hello,
On Thu 20 Jun 2019 at 04:43pm +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Seconded as well.
Thanks. Applied.
--
Sean Whitton
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:00:58 +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Fri 07 Jun 2019 at 10:50AM +01, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/policy/ch-relationships.rst b/policy/ch-relationships.rst
> > index 1d790e8..3b68420 100644
> > --- a/policy/ch-relationships.rst
> > +++
Hello,
On Fri 07 Jun 2019 at 10:50AM +01, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> diff --git a/policy/ch-relationships.rst b/policy/ch-relationships.rst
> index 1d790e8..3b68420 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-relationships.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-relationships.rst
> @@ -17,15 +17,16 @@ package names, separated by
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:44:10AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 at 21:54:40 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > This is a fair comment. The wording was potentially misleading. How about
> > the attached instead?
>
> This mostly looks good, just one thing that I would add:
>
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 at 21:54:40 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> This is a fair comment. The wording was potentially misleading. How about
> the attached instead?
This mostly looks good, just one thing that I would add:
> -If a relationship field has a version number attached, only real
>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:53:50AM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Dominic,
>
> Thank you for coming back to this.
>
> On Tue 01 Jan 2019 at 06:41pm GMT, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > -If a relationship field has a version number attached, only real
> > -packages will be considered to see
Hello Dominic,
Thank you for coming back to this.
On Tue 01 Jan 2019 at 06:41pm GMT, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> -If a relationship field has a version number attached, only real
> -packages will be considered to see whether the relationship is satisfied
> -(or the prohibition violated, for a
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:38:16PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:57:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> > dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
> > provides.
> […]
> > This clearly needs an update. No proposed wording yet, sorry.
>
> Here is
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:38:39PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, David Prévot wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:57:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
provides.
[…]
This clearly needs an
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 13:38:16 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:57:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
provides.
[…]
This clearly needs an update. No proposed wording yet, sorry.
Here is a simple
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:57:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
provides.
[…]
This clearly needs an update. No proposed wording yet, sorry.
Here is a simple one, stripping away the incorrect restriction. The
consideration about
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, David Prévot wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:57:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
provides.
[…]
This clearly needs an update. No proposed wording yet, sorry.
Here is a simple one, stripping away the
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.5.0
Severity: wishlist
dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
provides. From the dpkg changelog:
* Add versioned Provides support:
- Add a new dpkg --assert-versioned-provides command.
- Packages can provide a specific
Hi!
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 21:57:57 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned
provides. From the dpkg changelog:
* Add versioned Provides support:
- Add a new dpkg --assert-versioned-provides command.
- Packages can provide a
14 matches
Mail list logo
