On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 03:35:19PM -, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> The patch from upstream bugzilla didn’t apply (I guess it is
> against newer codebase), so we used the Fedora one.
Ok, since this hasn't been reviewed upstream yet and it only seems to
affect PPC64 I'd include it with the changes
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:32:29 +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> With the patch from Fedora, sphinx builds successfully on ppc64el.
>
> But then did you try the patch from Fedora or the one from the
> upstream bugzilla?
The patch from upstream bugzilla didn’t apply (I guess it is against
newer co
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:23:56PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > If you could give that patch a try we can try to have it included
> > in jessie.
>
> Sorry for the delay. We finally managed to test it (actually it was
> Laney who did that).
>
> With the patch from Fedora, sphinx builds succe
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:31:44 +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> If you could give that patch a try we can try to have it included in
> jessie.
Sorry for the delay. We finally managed to test it (actually it was Laney
who did that).
With the patch from Fedora, sphinx builds successfully on ppc64e
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:11:41PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> The upstream bug you linked has a patch by the same author, and
> dated newer. So I believe it _is_ forwarded, though upstream
> didn’t review it.
If you could give that patch a try we can try to have it included in
jessie.
Than
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130237
Hi Alberto,
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:56:00 +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> Thanks! And this seems to be the upstream bug report:
>
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130237
You are right, marking this bug as forwarded to th
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:04:06PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> My stack trace matches the stack trace of this Fedora bug report:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074093
Thanks! And this seems to be the upstream bug report:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130237
> And t
Control: tags -1 +patch
My stack trace matches the stack trace of this Fedora bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074093
And they seem to have a patch for it:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/webkitgtk3.git/tree/webkitgtk-2.4.1-ppc64_align.patch
--
Dmitry Shachnev
signatu
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:39:09 +0400, Vladimir Berezenko wrote:
> Seems very same to Bug #761040. I've got this in libqtwebkit on ppc. This bug
> is not occur on intel.
Bug #761040 is fixed now, and the changelog mentions that the issue
had something to do with powerpc being big endian.
Howev
В письме от 23 сентября 2014 09:48:46 пользователь Dmitry Shachnev написал:
> Package: libjavascriptcoregtk-3.0-0
> Version: 2.4.4-1
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> In Ubuntu, I noticed that sphinx autopkgtest consistently fails on ppc64el.
>
> The autopkgtest calls debian/jstest/run-tests Python scri
Package: libjavascriptcoregtk-3.0-0
Version: 2.4.4-1
Dear maintainers,
In Ubuntu, I noticed that sphinx autopkgtest consistently fails on ppc64el.
The autopkgtest calls debian/jstest/run-tests Python script, which creates
(via introspection) a web view, loads a page (which executes some javascri
11 matches
Mail list logo