Bug#763822: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#763822: Moving towards buildinfo on the archive network

2016-08-21 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Signatures provide a way to for us to aggregate public trust on binaries that > don't build themselves. So it's important to have multiple and *very direct* > meanings of what-is-being-signed, to avoid a transitive-trust situation. > I sent this in a rush; better version: Signatures

Bug#763822: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#763822: Moving towards buildinfo on the archive network

2016-08-21 Thread Ximin Luo
Jonathan McDowell: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 04:01:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote: >> You have this backwards. >> >> "Being able to verify individually who build each of the packages I'm >> running" >> >> is *exactly* what is required to *not* have to >> >> "attribute trust of *all* of the people who