Hi Juliusz,
What about mnsymbol? It's a fairly small package, and is a simple,
hassle-free way to get a bunch of mathematical symbols that blend
relatively well with many common fonts
I guess I don't have any overwhelming argument against it, but it would
be nice if I had a note
On 2014-10-10 at 22:00:55 +, Karl Berry wrote:
Hi Juliusz,
What about mnsymbol? It's a fairly small package, and is a
simple, hassle-free way to get a bunch of mathematical symbols
that blend relatively well with many common fonts
I guess I don't have any
In 2014, 200MB is noise level. I can see no reason whatsoever to factor
out some subset of this.
Philip Taylor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Do what you want in Debian, of course. (Do you exactly 100% follow the
TL collection constituents now?)
For TL, I see that c-fontsrecommended has txfonts and pxfonts. Perhaps
I should exchange those with the newtx and newpx in extra, but I'm not
sure. I have a feeling that an awful lot of
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Karl Berry wrote:
Do what you want in Debian, of course. (Do you exactly 100% follow the
TL collection constituents now?)
Yes, we follow it 100% (besides leaving out a few packages that
are packaged separately).
I don't want to just randomly add things to
5 matches
Mail list logo
