Bug#764301: Please provide a backport for Wheezy

2015-12-16 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Time to admit it, I'm never going to do this. Not opposed to someone else making an attempt. Note that the next webp release is going to break ABI compatibility.

Bug#764301: Please provide a backport for Wheezy

2014-10-14 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Sunday 12 October 2014 21:53:29 Jeff Breidenbach wrote: I don't know how to do a backport. The idea basically boils down to compile the package using wheezy's (or, if needed, wheezy-backport's) packages. I guess I could build a wheezy package with pbuilder, Yes but no idea what I'd do

Bug#764301: Please provide a backport for Wheezy

2014-10-12 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I don't know how to do a backport. I guess I could build a wheezy package with pbuilder, but no idea what I'd do with it next. Are backports usually done by the package maintainer, or someone else?

Bug#764301: Please provide a backport for Wheezy

2014-10-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Source: libwebp Version: 0.4.1-1.2+b1 Severity: wishlist Hi! In order to do a proper Wheezy backport of Qt5 it would be really cool to have the current version of libwebp as a backport too. Thanks, Lisandro. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign