Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Fernando Seiti Furusato
Source: supercollider Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build from source on ppc64el because the usage of altivec is not implemented for the architecture. So, the workaround was to disable it for ppc64el.

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi Fernando, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Fernando Seiti Furusato ferse...@br.ibm.com wrote: Source: supercollider Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build from source on ppc64el because the

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: Hi Fernando, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Fernando Seiti Furusato ferse...@br.ibm.com wrote: Source: supercollider Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el Dear

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread ferseiti
Hi Felipe. Thank you for your very quick response. What does usage of altivec is not implemented? In supecollider, or in the compiler? In supercollider. In any case, perhaps the solution is to disable supernova in ppc64el as well instead of adding custom flags. Simply disabling it for

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:39:18 -0200 ferse...@br.ibm.com wrote: In any case, perhaps the solution is to disable supernova in ppc64el as well instead of adding custom flags. Simply disabling it for ppc64el did not do the work (completely), but you can test it if you want =) The problem is

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi Konstantinos, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@freevec.org wrote: On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:39:18 -0200 ferse...@br.ibm.com wrote: In any case, perhaps the solution is to disable supernova in ppc64el as well instead of adding custom flags. Simply disabling

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:13:16 -0300 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: I had a few questions regarding the patch for enabling altivec on ppc32, I'll repeat them here: I'm very ignorant on altivec (or simd in general), but I try to understand the patch anyway. This patch seems to

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@freevec.org wrote: On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:13:16 -0300 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: I had a few questions regarding the patch for enabling altivec on ppc32, I'll repeat them here: I'm very ignorant on altivec (or

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

2014-10-24 Thread Dan S
Hi all - Felipe has covered most of the reviewing already. Just noting here that I have proposed to send the nova-simd part of this patch upstream: https://github.com/timblechmann/nova-simd/pull/2, plus: 2014-10-24 16:55 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at