Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > We packaged the following specifically as LXD dependencies which did go in: > > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-petname > (possibly others, hit-list

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi folks, We didn't manage to get LXD into the archive in time for the freeze. We packaged the following specifically as LXD dependencies which did go in: * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-petname (possibly others, hit-list

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi all, I was pinged about this today which reminded me to post an update to the bug. I'm unlikely to have enough time to finish packaging the rest of the dependencies before the freeze deadline. But the good news is we're very close anyway! Zhenech has golang-…-lxc.v2 imported to pkg-lxc

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Le 14 octobre 2016 13:33:53 GMT+02:00, "Clément Hermann" a écrit : >Le 14/10/2016 à 12:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: >>> A few of these dependencies are already in the archive, not all have >the >>> standard

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Le 14/10/2016 à 12:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> A few of these dependencies are already in the archive, not all have the >> standard naming yet, but I think about half of those are already packaged. > > Thanks! I've just gone

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: > A few of these dependencies are already in the archive, not all have the > standard naming yet, but I think about half of those are already packaged. Thanks! I've just gone through to re-check them, renamed a few to the canonical

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hello, I have been using LXD for many months now, so I am patiently waiting for the day when I will be able to use it on Debian! Thanks for all the work y'all. I was wondering what the plan is regarding the apparmor compatibility? I think that LXD needs apparmor and as far as I know, apparmor is

Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

Hi Jon, On 13/10/16 11:59, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Just a quick mail to say hello, I recently joined because I am interested Welcomed! :) > in packaging (at least) build dependencies for LXD, which is Canonical's > container hypervisor platform. > > The specific go dependencies that we need