Bill Allombert writes:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:08:31PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Thanks for your clarification. Is the attached patch OK ?
>> diff --git a/virtual-package-names-list.txt b/virtual-package-names-list.txt
>> index f52ddba..f68133f 100644
>> ---
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:08:31PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Thanks for your clarification. Is the attached patch OK ?
diff --git a/virtual-package-names-list.txt b/virtual-package-names-list.txt
index f52ddba..f68133f 100644
--- a/virtual-package-names-list.txt
+++
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:38:39PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
The httpd-wsgi virtual name was added in response to #588497.
However, as per the following email:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/09/msg00719.html
WSGI is an API, not a wire
On 23/11/14 17:19, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:38:39PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
We need two virtual package names, one for Python2 and one for Python3.
What I am unclear is why a single virtual package httpd-wsgi3 will work
for python 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 etc.
All versions of
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 05:45:37PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 23/11/14 17:19, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:38:39PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
We need two virtual package names, one for Python2 and one for Python3.
What I am unclear is why a single virtual package
On 24 November 2014 at 05:08, Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org wrote:
Thanks for your clarification. Is the attached patch OK ?
That looks good to me.
--
Brian May b...@debian.org
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
The httpd-wsgi virtual name was added in response to #588497.
However, as per the following email:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/09/msg00719.html
WSGI is an API, not a wire protocol. The Python version of the WSGI
server would also be the
Hi,
Brian May:
We need two virtual package names, one for Python2 and one for Python3.
So go for it. httpd-wsgi3?
I raised this issue on debian-devel, but unfortunately got noreponse
Probably because this is so obviously correct as to not require one. :-P
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
8 matches
Mail list logo