On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:58:50AM +, Robert de Bath wrote:
> [...]
> this list is also endless.
It certainly is, and I'm not interested in implementing all of these
suggestions. Some look very promising though, so I'll definitely try
to integrate them in Cattle.
> I look forward to your nex
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Beef's focus is on flexibilty rather than performance: as you noticed,
previous versions were not among the fastest Brainfuck interpreters
...
Then perhaps you should document where it's a flexible interpreter because
at the moment I'm not seeing a
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 09:49:59PM +, Robert de Bath wrote:
> The performace of the 1.0.1 version has dropped by about 98% compared
> to version 0.0.6 in wheezy. It now runs far slower than a naïve
> implementation such as the 22 line 'microbf' program and clocks in
> at around 2 times slo
Package: beef
Version: 1.0.1-1
The performace of the 1.0.1 version has dropped by about 98% compared
to version 0.0.6 in wheezy. It now runs far slower than a naïve
implementation such as the 22 line 'microbf' program and clocks in
at around 2 times slower than the fastest implementations.
4 matches
Mail list logo
