On 12/13/2015 04:41 AM, Austin English wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Jens Reyer wrote:
>> 1.)
>> Checking with "file" (but honoring the WINE* variables first) allows to
>> continue to default to Wine32, while you still can install 64-bit apps
>> without manual intervention. However at
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Jens Reyer wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 11:08 PM, Austin English wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Jens Reyer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> please see below for another patch. IMO it is clean, simple and
>>> matches the logic of the wine-script perfectly.
>>>
>>> It t
On 12/11/2015 11:08 PM, Austin English wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Jens Reyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> please see below for another patch. IMO it is clean, simple and
>> matches the logic of the wine-script perfectly.
>>
>> It tries to detect the correct wine version using the following
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Jens Reyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please see below for another patch. IMO it is clean, simple and
> matches the logic of the wine-script perfectly.
>
> It tries to detect the correct wine version using the following
> precedence:
>
> 1. WINEARCH - can't be misinterpreted
Hi,
please see below for another patch. IMO it is clean, simple and
matches the logic of the wine-script perfectly.
It tries to detect the correct wine version using the following
precedence:
1. WINEARCH - can't be misinterpreted and was also used
previously.
2. WINEPREFIX - if it is set and
5 matches
Mail list logo