On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:38:30PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >...
> > BTW: I don't use Eterm myself. Can you compile the version in unstable
> > under jessie and confirm that it also fixes the 100% CPU problem
> > reported here?
> >
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>...
> BTW: I don't use Eterm myself. Can you compile the version in unstable
> under jessie and confirm that it also fixes the 100% CPU problem
> reported here?
>...
What happened with this?
Should I prepare a package for jessie-pu?
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017, narf wrote:
> I have the same problem on debian jessie in i386 architecture.
> When will the fixed version (ß-9-6-4) are available i386?
Normally we would have to wait for the next stable to happen, but since
this bug makes the package not to work at all, I'll make an upload
Hello,
I have the same problem on debian jessie in i386 architecture.
When will the fixed version (ß-9-6-4) are available i386?
regards
Andy
4 matches
Mail list logo