Joe Stringer joestrin...@nicira.com writes:
I agree that this should be treated as a separate bug, yes please (I'm
just following up as it wasn't clear to me whether you're working on
this or not).
Ok, I'll report it as a new bug.
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 15 December 2014 at 10:21, Gurucharan Shetty shet...@nicira.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen s...@debian.org
wrote:
I would like to clarify that 2.3.1 does get rid of the check on
$RUNLEVEL which was the original bug description.
That's great, thanks. :)
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen s...@debian.org wrote:
Gurucharan Shetty shet...@nicira.com writes:
I haven't looked at what needs to be done to handle those statements.
I welcome a patch, preferably sent to d...@openvswitch.org after
reading the CONTRIBUTING.md in the
Gurucharan Shetty shet...@nicira.com writes:
I haven't looked at what needs to be done to handle those statements.
I welcome a patch, preferably sent to d...@openvswitch.org after
reading the CONTRIBUTING.md in the openvswitch repo.
I assume the openvswitch repo is at
Control: severity -1 serious
Hello,
Since the service does not start under the new default init, and since
it also does not follow includes from /etc/network/interfaces, I would
think this justifies a serious severity. Updating the severity
accordingly.
(I feel less bad about bumping severity
My previous reply did not do a good job with the context. It made it
look like OVS 2.3.1 handles source or source-directory statements.
That is not correct, it does not handle those statements. I haven't
looked at what needs to be done to handle those statements. I welcome
a patch, preferably sent
6 matches
Mail list logo
