Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm frank.br...@profitbricks.com
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
* URL :
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2014, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm frank.br...@profitbricks.com
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com writes:
The source is called pathlib, but the binary packages are called
python-pathlib and python-pathlib-doc.
Even for the source package name, =E2=80=9Cpathlib=E2=80=9D is IMO too gene=
ral. This is
specifically a library for Python programmers
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org writes:
On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general.
This is specifically a library for Python programmers only; its
source package name should not grab a generic name like “pathlib”.
Why not
On Dec 12, 2014, at 02:10 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Name collision is one such problem that can reasonably be foreseen if
the package name is too generic for its purpose.
Perhaps. It's worth doing a search of existing FLOSS projects and see if
there are existing projects that could reasonably
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm frank.br...@profitbricks.com
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
* License : MIT Licence
Programming
6 matches
Mail list logo
