On 2015-01-28 03:21, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> There is a new sudo RC bug #776137 (not related to this issue). That
> also needs fixing before an unblock will likely be granted.
Thank you for pointing this out. I submitted a patch, but it still needs
independent testing.
Regards,
Christian
--
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-01-17 20:38, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> Don't remove the moreinfo tag from this bug when the upload enters t-p-u
>> (unless you have other info to add to the discussion). Leave it there for at
>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
On 2015-01-17 20:38, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Don't remove the moreinfo tag from this bug when the upload enters t-p-u
> (unless you have other info to add to the discussion). Leave it there for at
> least 5 days. After that, remove the moreinfo tag from this bug and
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:13:37PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> On 2015-01-17 07:57, martin f krafft wrote:
>> > Christian, I suppose it'll have to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u.
>> > Doable?
>
> Martin,
also sprach Ivo De Decker [2015-01-17 20:38 +0100]:
> Martin, did you actually test that version? If so, please let us
> know.
Yes I did, a long time ago though.
> I'm still not convinced. You didn't really give an argument why an
> update via unstable wouldn't work.
Because a newer version is
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:13:37PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2015-01-17 07:57, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Christian, I suppose it'll have to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u.
> > Doable?
Martin, did you actually test that version? If so, please let us know.
> S
also sprach Christian Kastner [2015-01-17 16:13 +0100]:
> So if everyone is OK with the above, I guess all that remains is for
> someone to sponsor the upload.
Which cannot go via unstable anymore unless you introduce an epoch.
Since the fix has been in unstable for 3 weeks (along with other
cha
On 2015-01-17 07:57, martin f krafft wrote:
> Christian, I suppose it'll have to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u.
> Doable?
Sure. Updated debdiff attached. (Did I get the revision right? Note that
I dropped the nmu-ish .1 as I felt the +deb8u1 qualifier "consumes" it)
Ivo had concerns with regards to a
also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2015-01-17 00:20 +0100]:
> It is a new upstream version. Jessie has 1.8.10, sid has 1.8.11.
> (The diff is also significant, even after stripping obvious
> noise.)
Ah, sorry. I had somehow overlooked that.
Christian, I suppose it'll have to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u.
On 2015-01-14 21:40, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Ivo De Decker [2015-01-14 21:58 +0100]:
I'm reluctant to allow this, as this essentially means dumping this
new
version into jessie untested. I would prefer if it was just uploaded
to
unstable (reverting the new upstream version there), t
also sprach Ivo De Decker [2015-01-14 21:58 +0100]:
> I'm reluctant to allow this, as this essentially means dumping this new
> version into jessie untested. I would prefer if it was just uploaded to
> unstable (reverting the new upstream version there), to allow it to be tested
> there, and migra
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 2015-01-14 21:58, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>>
>> Based on a patch provided by upstream, I created a debdiff (attached)
>> for 1.8.10p3 in testing with the following changelog entry:
>>
>> * Backport upstream's fix for host specifications using a FQDN.
>>The
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
(rearranging the original mail a bit)
>
> Furthermore, I was wondering though whether you'd consider allowing
> sudo/1.8.11p2 from unstable to migrate.
>
> The diff between testing and unstable is
On 2014-12-22 15:15, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2014-12-16 22:02, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> If allowing 1.8.11p2 to migrate is something you'd consider discussing,
>> please let me know how I can help in your deliberations. If this change
>> is simply too big, please let me know if you are OK
Hi,
On 2014-12-16 22:02, Christian Kastner wrote:
> If allowing 1.8.11p2 to migrate is something you'd consider discussing,
> please let me know how I can help in your deliberations. If this change
> is simply too big, please let me know if you are OK with the t-p-u
> upload of the attached debdif
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi release team,
With the maintainer's permission [1], I'd like to ask for your opinion
on how to proceed with #731583.
Based on a patch provided by upstream, I created a debdiff (attache
16 matches
Mail list logo
