On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
* Package name: xlennart
This should be a patch against xbill, switching on argv[0].
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Uli Du hast Recht.
Uli Du hast Recht!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Freitag, 16. Januar 2015, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
I think it is not going farther than XBill. Permitting of XBill and
forbidding of XLennart making double standards. Forbid both or permit both.
Lennart is part of our community. Bill Gates aint.
And the disclaimer, this aint ment to be
On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
(Also, in any case, don't you think that this game is going a little too
far? It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart
Well, do you see a difference to the original game
Hello.
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
(Also,
Dmitry,
On 16/01/15 09:48 AM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
It's an ITP, so it goes to debian-devel by default to discuss amongst
ourselves whether a package is suitable
Hi,
On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Hello.
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
You are welcome to discuss this game on our dedicated Debian Games
mailing list,
On 16/01/15 11:34 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
My personal opinion is that both XBill and xlennart are mildly
entertaining and it is rather immature to depict living people as a
virus. The message is either silly or offensive.
While we're talking about personal opinions, and clarifying for
On 01/16/2015 06:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart to xperson
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 16:48 +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Hello.
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Dmitry,
On 16/01/15 12:17 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
I see. By the way, it's _not my_ changes. I'm just a Debian user that
tries to get more experience of Debian packaging. I found the project
(xlennart) and just wanted to make a package and find a sponsor. I
didn't expected that this will
On 01/16/2015 08:05 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 16/01/15 12:17 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
I see. By the way, it's _not my_ changes. I'm just a Debian user that
tries to get more experience of Debian packaging. I found the project
(xlennart) and just wanted to make a package and find a
On 16/01/15 01:33 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Isn't it premature? Shouldn't abandoned ITP be converted to RFP. If I
close the bug it may be duplicated by somebody else, soon. Sorry for my
newbie-ness.
Closing the bug doesn't make it vanish from the system. People will
still be able to find it
On 16/01/15 01:33 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Isn't it premature? Shouldn't abandoned ITP be converted to RFP. If I
close the bug it may be duplicated by somebody else, soon. Sorry for my
newbie-ness.
Closing the bug doesn't make it vanish from the system. People will
still be able to find it
Hi,
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
Practically, it's more important to maintain good relations with Lennart
Poettering than with Bill Gates.
fwiw I don't think Lennart Poettering personally would care very
much. He has a thick skin and has more than once poked fun at people for
Axel Wagner m...@merovius.de writes:
[…]
I don't think Lennart personally would care, no, but I think *we*
should care to paint the Opensource community as better than this.
As a member of the said community, I think that, however the
presence of either of the packages in
While not a full-scale ad-hominem attack, I’d say that the two
differences I know of between the vrms operation and the
official FSF position amount to a misrepresentation at best.
Are we going to drop that package, too?
If you apt-cache show vrms, you will see the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru
* Package name: xlennart
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Gethyn Thomas Quail xylem2...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Hello.
On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
* URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart
Sorry. Pasted a wrong URL.
The real URL is: https://github.com/Xylemon/xlennart
Best regards, Dmitry.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le jeudi, 15 janvier 2015, 20.26:25 Dmitry Yu Okunev a écrit :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru
* Package name: xlennart
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Gethyn Thomas Quail xylem2...@gmail.com
* URL :
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:26 +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru
* Package name: xlennart
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Gethyn Thomas Quail xylem2...@gmail.com
* URL :
* URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart
The URL should be the main branch of xlennart; that is
https://github.com/Xylemon/xlennart
if there are other packages providing similar functionality, how does it
compare?
This's a fork of XBill. Everything the same, just with
Hello.
On 01/15/2015 11:04 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:26 +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Description : An XBill fork but with Lennart and SystenD instead of
Bill
Please, give it a rest. This isn't funny or clever.
What do you mean? XBill is fine, but XLennart
Hello.
On 01/16/2015 08:53 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
* URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart
The URL should be the main branch of xlennart; that is
https://github.com/Xylemon/xlennart
Yes, sorry. That was a mis-copy. I already commented the real URL in
this issue (bug#775436).
It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart
Poettering what the gamergate people did to Anita Sarkeesian.)
I don't like mix politics and FOSS. FOSS is freedom. IMHO, nobody
should forbid anybody to distribute any free package due to
politics or something like this. Sorry if
24 matches
Mail list logo
