Seems this is related to #753580.
If I got you correctly you would like to derive the default
value for accept_ra depending upon static address and routing
information in /etc/network/interfaces. Is that correct?
No problem with me.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-re
On Jan 18, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Probably, to have an automatically assigned IP address, I don't know.
No, because the address directive is mandatory.
You *can* configure an address and use RA to get the gateway, but then
you would not configure the gateway.
I have checked the changelog but I
Probably, to have an automatically assigned IP address, I don't know.
--
Cheers,
Andrew
On Jan 18, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> You're sure about it? I remember I changed the default from 0 on a request
> from some bug report.
What is the point of accepting RAs if you have manually configured
a default route?
--
ciao,
Marco
pgpkbt5lLWd21.pgp
Description: PGP signature
You're sure about it? I remember I changed the default from 0 on a request
from some bug report.
--
Cheers,
Andrew
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.7.52
Severity: normal
If a gateway directive is configured for interfaces of static type then
accept_ra should default to 0 or the kernel log will be flooded with
messages like:
[43492.243376] ICMPv6: RA: ndisc_router_discovery failed to add default route
This shou
6 matches
Mail list logo
