On 16 February 2016 at 11:13, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On 11 February 2016 at 17:50, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> It's the standard library packages, GOARCH=arm go install runtime is
>> going to try to create $GOROOT/pkg/linux_arm/runtime.a.
>
>
On 11 February 2016 at 17:50, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> I'm not sure I want to be the one that takes that one upstream.
Totally fair -- I just meant that it's something that probably ought
to be taken upstream, not necessarily that I expected you to do so;
sorry
On 4 February 2016 at 16:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> I guess it could be fixed by going back to building lots of
> golang-$GOOS-$GOARCH packages, but somehow that doesn't seem very
> appealing, it would be nicer to allow the go install command to work
> (which
On 12 February 2016 at 12:44, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On 4 February 2016 at 16:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> I guess it could be fixed by going back to building lots of
>> golang-$GOOS-$GOARCH packages, but somehow that doesn't seem very
>>
* Michael Hudson-Doyle:
> I guess it could be fixed by going back to building lots of
> golang-$GOOS-$GOARCH packages, but somehow that doesn't seem very
> appealing,
Another option may be building *one* extra package that contains the
stdlib and whatever bits may be necessary for building for
On 4 February 2016 at 02:12, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Tianon Gravi:
>
>> I'm not positive whether all were required for this to work, but given
>> that it _did_ work, I think this is in the realm of possible with the
>> changes of Go 1.5 and am inclined to close this bug as
On 7 March 2015 at 09:21, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> As far as I can see, it does not. The only notable change is that
> cgo.a files are installed for more than one architecture.
>
>> Also, what's the impact on the future Go 1.5, especially the new,
>> simpler cross-compile[1] that
* Tianon Gravi:
> I'm not positive whether all were required for this to work, but given
> that it _did_ work, I think this is in the realm of possible with the
> changes of Go 1.5 and am inclined to close this bug as "fixed" --
> thoughts? :)
Unfortunately, it's not that easy. :-(
Last time I
8 matches
Mail list logo