On 4 February 2016 at 16:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> I guess it could be fixed by going back to building lots of
> golang-$GOOS-$GOARCH packages, but somehow that doesn't seem very
> appealing, it would be nicer to allow the go install command to work
> (which
On 12 February 2016 at 12:44, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On 4 February 2016 at 16:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> I guess it could be fixed by going back to building lots of
>> golang-$GOOS-$GOARCH packages, but somehow that doesn't seem very
>>
2 matches
Mail list logo