Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-13 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 12:19:53AM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe wait over

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com writes: On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name. Will do. Thanks.

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com writes: On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: 1) name of the psuedopackage Presumably, that's summit.debconf.org in this case. Correct. 2) a short description of what the

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian list infrastructure anyway. Yes. I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Fine by

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want to talk about summit specifically? OTOH, what if we use

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian list infrastructure

Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front