Matthias Klose writes:
> you could use -P, or fix the parsing.
a first minimal hackish patch (not using -P)
likely this is not really good enough yet (but yes it compiles and
passes the tests)
Maybe a version using -P just using the last n lines of the cpp output
would be
maybe at least play a bit safer:
Index: gauche-c-wrapper-0.6.1/src/c-parser.c
===
--- gauche-c-wrapper-0.6.1.orig/src/c-parser.c
+++ gauche-c-wrapper-0.6.1/src/c-parser.c
@@ -1668,6 +1668,8 @@ ScmObj Scm_ParseMacroCode(ScmObj in, Scm
On 06/26/2015 11:36 PM, Jens Thiele wrote:
Martin Michlmayr t...@hp.com writes:
I'm not Matthias, but I can confirm that the package fails to build in
a Debian unstable chroot with GCC 5 the way Matthias reported.
(sid-gcc5)1878:tbm@bl460gen8-30: ~/gauche-c-wrapper-0.6.1] cat test.h
Severity: important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reduced severity to important because i don't think the bug report is
valid.
see also:
http://sourceforge.net/p/gauche/mailman/message/33853322/
never got an answer to my last mail
looking at
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20150402-vivid.html
it seems only
* Jens Thiele ka...@karme.de [2015-06-26 10:10]:
you really should provide output of something like this:
$ cat EOF test.h
#define B() 1
#define A B
EOF
$ echo -e 100\nB()\nA|gcc-YOURVERSION -E -include test.h -|tail
I'm not Matthias, but I can confirm that the package fails to build in
a
Martin Michlmayr t...@hp.com writes:
I'm not Matthias, but I can confirm that the package fails to build in
a Debian unstable chroot with GCC 5 the way Matthias reported.
(sid-gcc5)1878:tbm@bl460gen8-30: ~/gauche-c-wrapper-0.6.1] cat test.h
#define B() 1
#define A B
7 matches
Mail list logo