Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:22:02PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > >> Can you please test that qtdeclarative with your patch builds/works? > > > > It built ok. Not sure what's the best way to test whether it executes > > (end-user reverse-deps like, say, 2048-qt, require far more qt5.4 parts). >

Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-27 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Adam, On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:41:13 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: >> Did you check if there should be a similar change in qv4targetplatform_p.h? > > All of that file is #if ENABLE(ASSEMBLER), which my patch disables on x32 > (using non-JIT code paths). Once real porting is done, the CPU(X86_64) p

Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-26 Thread Adam Borowski
Sorry for the delay, I was busy, ehm, contemplating how much damage rsync without --numeric-ids can do. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:04:06PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > A couple of questions though: > > > // NOTE: This should match the logic in qv4targetplatform_p.h! > > Did you check if ther

Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-26 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Adam, On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 00:01:20 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Sure. The patch appears to be too small to be copyrightable, but anyway, I > hereby grant the right to use it under any license of your choice. Thanks! I will forward it (the Q_OS_WIN vs Q_OS_WINDOWS change doesn't really matter,

Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-20 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Saturday 21 February 2015 00:01:20 Adam Borowski wrote: [snip] > > Can you please send this upstream to https://codereview.qt-project.org/? > > I looked at the upstream website, and found it quite confusing. Thus, if > you could forward the patch, it would be nice. > > > Or, if you can't do i

Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:22:06PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:08:49 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > The fix needs two parts: > > * applying the attached patch: fixing misdetection of x32 as i386/amd64 > > (a proper port of the JIT would be of course better, but take a

Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Adam, On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:08:49 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Hi! > This package fails to build on the x32 second-class architecture. This is > bad as it has a massive amount of reverse [build-]dependencies, both direct > and transitive. > > The fix needs two parts: > * applying the attache

Bug#778257: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: JIT, symbols

2015-02-12 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src Version: 5.3.2-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi! This package fails to build on the x32 second-class architecture. This is bad as it has a massive amount of reverse [build-]dependencies, both direct and transitive. The fix needs two parts: * applying th