Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-12 Thread Rémi Vanicat
package magit fixed 782538 magit/2.2.2-1 thanks For some reason, this bug hasn't been closed as it should, so closing it. I'm waiting for the package to go to testing to go to the dh-elpa way. Everything is already in the elpa-master branch of the collabmaint git repository, and should be the

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-06 Thread Rémi Vanicat
"Barak A. Pearlmutter" writes: > On 2 September 2015 at 23:01, Rémi Vanicat wrote: >> Okay. I will see to import this into the pkg-emacsen stuff this week-end and >> then to port it to the new elpa stuff. > > Can I suggest not letting the perfect be

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-03 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
On 2 September 2015 at 23:01, Rémi Vanicat wrote: > Okay. I will see to import this into the pkg-emacsen stuff this week-end and > then to port it to the new elpa stuff. Can I suggest not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good? We could upload a non-dh-elpa version, and

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi, "Barak A. Pearlmutter" writes: > I did a tentative packaging upstream version 2.2.1 for my own use, > based of course on the packaging in the collab-maint git repo. > > I've taken the liberty of pushing the new upstream tarballs into that > repo on the upstream &

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Rémi Vanicat writes: > I should have posted it there previously, but I intended to ask you if > you want the magit package to be maintained by the new pkg-emacsen > teams[1]. In this case it should use the new, simpler (but very > experimental) elpa-* packaging style instead

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes: > Sorry I mean DEP-9, like this: No, I really mean DEP-3.. :) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ -Timo

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes: > Thanks. Could you use DEP-5 syntax for debian/patches/*? In particular Sorry I mean DEP-9, like this: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/magit.git/tree/debian/patches/bug-718861.patch?id=2ed57a88eec34b781d7fcf91881d3fa5c08ac1ce

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Rémi Vanicat
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes: > Timo Juhani Lindfors writes: >> Sorry I mean DEP-9, like this: > > No, I really mean DEP-3.. :) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ I should have posted it there previously, but I intended to ask you if you want the magit

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Okay. The patches are formatted by gbp-pq import/export, so they're in the DEP-3 format already. But I added some text and fields in rewritten history and force-pushed to the barak-master branch.

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Rémi Vanicat
Okay. I will see to import this into the pkg-emacsen stuff this week-end and then to port it to the new elpa stuff. Le mer. 2 sept. 2015 à 20:24, Barak A. Pearlmutter a écrit : > Okay. > The patches are formatted by gbp-pq import/export, so they're in the > DEP-3 format

Bug#782538: Packaged Version 2.2.1

2015-09-02 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I did a tentative packaging upstream version 2.2.1 for my own use, based of course on the packaging in the collab-maint git repo. I've taken the liberty of pushing the new upstream tarballs into that repo on the upstream & pristine-tar branches, with matching upstream/* tags. I also pushed the