Bug#784181: razorqt: Razor-Qt dead upstream, superseded by LXDE-Qt

2017-04-01 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi Steve, (it's a long message, the important bits are just at the bottom). 2017-04-01 20:48 Steve Langasek: Hi Manuel, In May 2015, you wrote: I plan to ask FTP-masters for removal from unstable in a few months, when the new desktop is usable. But then in December 2016, you wrote: I am

Bug#784181: razorqt: Razor-Qt dead upstream, superseded by LXDE-Qt

2017-04-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Manuel, In May 2015, you wrote: > I plan to ask FTP-masters for removal from unstable in a few months, when > the new desktop is usable. But then in December 2016, you wrote: > I am not sure, is there a big compelling reason to remove it, like big > security bugs? It's dead upstream but it'

Bug#784181: razorqt: Razor-Qt dead upstream, superseded by LXDE-Qt

2016-12-18 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi, 2016-12-12 2:22 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Bicha : > I see that razorqt was removed from testing, but why not remove it > from unstable too now? I am not sure, is there a big compelling reason to remove it, like big security bugs? It's dead upstream but it's still working fine without maintainance, an

Bug#784181: razorqt: Razor-Qt dead upstream, superseded by LXDE-Qt

2016-12-11 Thread Jeremy Bicha
I see that razorqt was removed from testing, but why not remove it from unstable too now? Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#784181: razorqt: Razor-Qt dead upstream, superseded by LXDE-Qt

2015-05-03 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Source: razorqt Version: 0.5.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: upstream The project has merged with LXDE to form LXDE-Qt, and new packages from the new effort will pop up soon in Debian, so Razor-Qt should not be present in the next releases, thus submitting this bug report to get it removed from testin