Bug#785665: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2018-02-27 Thread Richard Laager
On 01/10/2018 11:03 PM, Daniel M. Weeks wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:00:50 -0600 Richard Laager wrote: >> I recommend *against* enabling ATOM support. I retract the above statement. Sorry for the noise. I must have been thinking of a different driver. Driver 22 (REFID "PPS") in

Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2018-01-10 Thread Daniel M. Weeks
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:00:50 -0600 Richard Laager wrote: > I recommend *against* enabling ATOM support. > > It is much better to use SHM to talk to gpsd. Here are a whole bunch of > details: > http://www.catb.org/gpsd/gpsd-time-service-howto.html > Richard, There is nothing

Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2017-11-08 Thread Richard Laager
I recommend *against* enabling ATOM support. It is much better to use SHM to talk to gpsd. Here are a whole bunch of details: http://www.catb.org/gpsd/gpsd-time-service-howto.html -- Richard

Bug#785665: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2017-04-23 Thread Robin Laing
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:21:18 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:51:44 +0100 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Maybe the point is that PPS is currently not supported, and that's > really all that needs to be fixed? It's better to support if it doesn't

Bug#785665: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2016-01-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 09:18:23PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Control: tags -1 +patch > > Hi, > > Is there any reason to not enable atom driver support by default? > Several raspi users do rebuild ntp to enable it to build Stratum-1 server, > so release it with this feature is handy for

Bug#785665: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2016-01-16 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:34:42 +0100 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Are you sure that this is actually needed and that it just isn't > disabled by default in some derived distribution? It seems that ATOM driver is necessary for PPS. see

Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2016-01-16 Thread Hideki Yamane
Control: tags -1 +patch Hi, Is there any reason to not enable atom driver support by default? Several raspi users do rebuild ntp to enable it to build Stratum-1 server, so release it with this feature is handy for them. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org

Bug#785665: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2016-01-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 10:19:45PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:34:42 +0100 > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Are you sure that this is actually needed and that it just isn't > > disabled by default in some derived distribution? > > It seems that ATOM driver is

Bug#785665: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2016-01-16 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:51:44 +0100 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Maybe the point is that PPS is currently not supported, and that's > really all that needs to be fixed? It's better to support if it doesn't have any side effect, IMHO. And I don't have any idea for it, it's good to ask

Bug#785665: ntp: support for atom driver not included

2015-05-18 Thread Folkert van Heusden
Package: ntp Version: 1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-7 Severity: normal When trying to use the atom driver, the following error appears: May 18 23:32:52 neo ntpd[12749]: refclock_newpeer: clock type 22 invalid May 18 23:32:52 neo ntpd[12749]: 127.127.22.1 interface 127.0.0.1 - (none) This means that atom