On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:41 AM, James Godfrey-Kittle wrote:
> Well, I suppose that makes sense since there is the option to build the
> fonts. However I must point out that having sources for fonts is unusual
> (probably because the distinction between source and binary is less clear
> than with
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 7:33 AM, James Godfrey-Kittle wrote:
> It might be worth noting that prebuilt fonts now exist on the Roboto github
> page: https://github.com/google/roboto/releases
>
> Roboto is constantly being updated with fixes, so if you ever feel inspired
> to update the Debian
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
Package: fonts-roboto
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if fonts-roboto could be built from source now that
Google actually made Roboto open source and released source/build stuff:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 12:28 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Currently fonts-roboto is part of fonts-android using separate upstream
means splitting roboto out of fonts-android source and make separate
package.
Obviously splitting fonts-roboto into a new fonts-roboto source package
is the correct
Package: fonts-roboto
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if fonts-roboto could be built from source now that
Google actually made Roboto open source and released source/build stuff:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/05/roboto-googles-signature-font-is-now.html
5 matches
Mail list logo
