Bug#787249: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#787249: Bug#787249: clamav-daemon: clamdscan scans less than clamscan; worsened in latest release

2015-06-12 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Sebastian, On 12.06.2015 21:46, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2015-06-05 21:52:14 [+0200], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> I've just pushed a commit implementing this. >> Since this again depends on a 'dpkg --compare-versions', we should backport >> it to all branches. > > Sure thing. Is t

Bug#787249: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#787249: Bug#787249: clamav-daemon: clamdscan scans less than clamscan; worsened in latest release

2015-06-12 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2015-06-05 21:52:14 [+0200], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Andreas, > I've just pushed a commit implementing this. > Since this again depends on a 'dpkg --compare-versions', we should backport > it to all branches. Sure thing. Is there something you want me to do? Is there someth

Bug#787249: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#787249: Bug#787249: clamav-daemon: clamdscan scans less than clamscan; worsened in latest release

2015-06-05 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Sebastian, On 31.05.2015 16:40, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:19:11PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> I'm fine with raising the default value in the config file to 16 since it is >>> clamd's default value. >> >> I think that would be the best way forward. > o

Bug#787249: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#787249: Bug#787249: clamav-daemon: clamdscan scans less than clamscan; worsened in latest release

2015-05-31 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:19:11PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Andreas, > > I'm fine with raising the default value in the config file to 16 since it is > > clamd's default value. > > I think that would be the best way forward. okay. > > We also could drop all "default" va

Bug#787249: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#787249: Bug#787249: clamav-daemon: clamdscan scans less than clamscan; worsened in latest release

2015-05-30 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Sebastian, On 30.05.2015 21:35, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 03:06:33PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> I found the reason, why clam_cache_emax.tgz is not detected by clamdscan: >> It hits the MaxRecursion limit of 10, while it needs 17 recursions. > > 16 to be

Bug#787249: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#787249: Bug#787249: clamav-daemon: clamdscan scans less than clamscan; worsened in latest release

2015-05-30 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 03:06:33PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > I found the reason, why clam_cache_emax.tgz is not detected by clamdscan: > It hits the MaxRecursion limit of 10, while it needs 17 recursions. 16 to be exact. Just verified it on Wheezy. The testsuite passes and since I don't se