On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:14:51PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Niels,
Thanks for looking into this. :)
I got a few minor comments interleaved below:
np, updated patch attached.
Thanks,
~Niels
Sebastian
From fb8deee8e2fe3b26f68d137dd6c8bfca50a27fbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 2015-06-05 19:17:07 [+0200], Guillem Jover wrote:
it should not. So I think that, to avoid false-positives, only undefined
symbols should be considered.
Added a patch for this. Another limition could be to look for symbols from
GLIBC. With what you suggested
On 2015-07-22 13:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 2015-06-05 19:17:07 [+0200], Guillem Jover wrote:
it should not. So I think that, to avoid false-positives, only undefined
symbols should be considered.
Added a patch for this. Another limition could be to
On 2015-07-22 14:14, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
Another (additional) limitation could be to limit the version to ^GLIBC_
as all the symbols for the LFS check come from GLIBC.
With this patch the inetutils-ftpd package is no longer marked with
binary-file-built-without-LFS-support while
Control: tags -1 pending
On 2015-07-22 22:14, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:14:51PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Niels,
Thanks for looking into this. :)
I got a few minor comments interleaved below:
np, updated patch attached.
Thanks,
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.31
Severity: wishlist
Tags: lfs
Hi!
I was checking the tags for inetutils when I noticed that inetutils-ftpd
is marked as binary-file-built-without-LFS-support, but only that binary
out of all binaries. The build system enables LFS, and the relevant files
include
6 matches
Mail list logo
