Dear Maria, Thanks for your report! However, this issue is already fixed in the upstream code since February 16th, 2015 [1].
Unfortunately, I am still waiting for sponsor to review/upload the latest version of the Orthanc package [2]. I have therefore tagged your bug as closed in the d/changelog [3]. Regards, Sébastien- [1] https://code.google.com/p/orthanc/source/detail?spec=svn8e23f16a198d616e15ab3ad43c54891acdb67603&r=6ed49334d5c11d99072ea8a925fa2d6873c7ebd2 [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2015/06/msg00037.html [3] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/changelog?revision=19339&view=markup ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Maria Valentina Marin" <marival...@gmail.com> > À: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <sub...@bugs.debian.org> > Envoyé: Mardi 16 Juin 2015 11:13:44 > Objet: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#788920: orthanc: please make the build > reproducible > > Source: orthanc > Version: 0.8.4+dfsg-2 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: timestamps > > Hi, > > While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed > that orthanc could not be built reproducibly. > > The attached patch changes the value of HTML_TIMESTAMP in the file > Orthanc.doxygen from YES to NO. Once applied orthanc can be built > reproducibly in our current experimental framework. > > Patching the doxyfile is necessary in this case because of the following > reasons: > > 1. Even though the doxygen upstream changed the default value of > HTML_TIMESTAMP from YES to NO this does not affect this package because > the value of HTML_TIMESTAMP is explicitly set to YES. > > 2. Upstream's doxyfiles cannot reliably be modified to change the value > of HTML_TIMESTAMP during the build process because dh_doxygen is only > run after the build already completed and even adding a new dh command > cannot solve the problem because there exists no sane and reliable > solution to detect the file which will be used as the configuration file > for doxygen (it is not always called doxyfile). > > 3. In case of this source package a patch against upstream is necessary > in contrast to a patch against Debian rules because this source package > does not call doxygen in debian/rules. > > Please also consider forwarding this patch upstream. > > Cheers! > akira > > [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org