On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
>> * leksah ought to be removed from testing:
>>
>>https://bugs.debian.org/789521
>
> ✓
These two migrated back as there's no RC bug on them. I've re-added the removal
hint
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.06.2015, 02:53 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo
Monfort:
> This may need a binNMU:
>
> haskell-trifecta (1.4.3-1 to 1.5.1.3-4)
> Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
> 9 days old (needed 5 days)
> libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends:
> libghc-charset-d
This may need a binNMU:
haskell-trifecta (1.4.3-1 to 1.5.1.3-4)
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
9 days old (needed 5 days)
libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends:
libghc-charset-dev-0.3.7.1-1690c
libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends:
libghc-comonad-
On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
>> * leksah ought to be removed from testing:
>>
>>https://bugs.debian.org/789521
>
> ✓
>
>> * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built
>>
>> https://buildd.debi
On 24/06/15 17:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/06/15 17:48, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of
Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the
>>
>>> age-days 0 gitit/0.10.7-1
>>
>> You could grant p
On 24/06/15 17:48, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of
>>> Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the
>
>> age-days 0 gitit/0.10.7-1
>
> You could grant piuparts a day to find new problems (and someone (hmm,
>
>> There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of
>> Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the
> age-days 0 gitit/0.10.7-1
You could grant piuparts a day to find new problems (and someone (hmm,
probably me) to file bugs) :-)
Anyway, that's yesterd
On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
>> * leksah ought to be removed from testing:
>>
>>https://bugs.debian.org/789521
>
> ✓
>
>> * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built
>>
>> https://buildd.debi
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> * leksah ought to be removed from testing:
>
>https://bugs.debian.org/789521
✓
> * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-server+haskell
On 23/06/15 15:05, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another update.
>
> Am Sonntag, den 21.06.2015, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
>> So it seems that with the right removal hints (basically everything
>> that has an RM bug + haskell-leksah + haskell-leksah-server) and some
>> aging, we c
Hi,
another update.
Am Sonntag, den 21.06.2015, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> So it seems that with the right removal hints (basically everything
> that has an RM bug + haskell-leksah + haskell-leksah-server) and some
> aging, we could be good to go.
The FTP team performed all the requ
Dear release team,
a small update on this.
Am Samstag, den 20.06.2015, 12:24 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> * shake not building on powerpc
Identified as a bug in ghc, test suite disabled.
We now have weird test suite failing issues on kfreebsd-*, that seem to
depend on the builder. But kfr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release team,
we (the Debian Haskell Group) has been working hard to get everything in
order for GHC 7.8 to migrate to testing (and to
13 matches
Mail list logo
