Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes:
On 06/29/2015 07:57 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:02:29 +0200 Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nl
wrote:
Control: retitle -1 gcc-5-mips-32-fpxx
Control: tag -1 patch
Any consider of this patch?
Please could somebody
On 06/29/2015 07:57 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:02:29 +0200 Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nl
wrote:
Control: retitle -1 gcc-5-mips-32-fpxx
Control: tag -1 patch
Any consider of this patch?
Please could somebody clarify, if this bumps hardware requirements to newer
On 07/02/2015 02:11 PM, Matthew Fortune wrote:
With this change in place then I would hope you can move to binutils 2.25,
, glibc 2.21 and kernel headers 4.1 if this has not already happened. It is
important that glibc is rebuilt after all the other changes so that
all the new forwards
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:02:29 +0200 Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nl wrote:
Control: retitle -1 gcc-5-mips-32-fpxx
Control: tag -1 patch
Any consider of this patch?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Control: retitle -1 gcc-5-mips-32-fpxx
Control: tag -1 patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: gcc-5
Version: 5.1.1-11
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-m...@lists.debian.org,
matthew.fort...@imgtec.com, james.cowg...@imgtec.com,
ian.oli...@imgtec.com
We are proposed to configure gcc with
--with-fp-32=xx
option for mips O32 ABI.
The three primary reasons for extending the current O32 ABI
6 matches
Mail list logo
