Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi Guilhem, one last more thing. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dropbear/2014.65-1ubuntu1 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dropbear/2014.65-1ubuntu2 how do you feel about merging the two above Ubuntu deltas in the Debian packaging? I'm going to sponsor soon, it has been a few days and

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 at 17:19:24 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > how do you feel about merging the two above Ubuntu deltas in the Debian > packaging? Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't check the Ubuntu uploads, actually. >

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi! On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 at 15:49:18 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > no problem, just ping me whenever your package becomes ready again. So with Guillem Jover's help on #debian-dpkg I managed to solve the problem of the configuration file in dropbear 2014.65-1's /usr. (Using

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 at 14:47:21 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > cat of what? I'm not sure this is correct... can you please clarify? cat of the ‘showpubkey’ function's standard input :-) ‘showpubkey’ is used as follows: dropbearkey … | showpubkey "$keyfile" dropbearkey(1) prints

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

no problem, just ping me whenever your package becomes ready again. I would like to avoid uploading on binNEW queue if there still is something to look (in the meanwhile we might have some more eyes on the package) cheers, Happy hacking! G. Il Venerdì 2 Ottobre 2015 17:06, Guilhem Moulin

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, continuing the review: debian/dropbear-initramfs.postinst "if ! which ssh-keygen >/dev/null 2>&1; then cat else " cat of what? I'm not sure this is correct... can you please clarify? after that well, I don't have any more issue. " dropbear (2015.68-1) experimental; urgency=low * New

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Date:Wed, 30 Sep, 2015 at 20:01 Subject:Re: Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client Hej Gianfranco! On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 20:25:08 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > You'll find the new upload at > >  dget -x >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 at 17:53:21 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, I could own the bug no problem, just I would like to avoid > stealing the package to Helmut! Fair enough :-) > - dpkg shows that a default configuration file has changed, asking me how to > proceed This is because

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hej Gianfranco! On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 20:25:08 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > You'll find the new upload at > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dropbear/dropbear_2015.68-1.dsc Did you have time to look at the new upload yet? (Since you didn't take ownership of the RFS

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 13:59:11 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> Making people upset was certainly not my intention. And it's precisely >> because I don't have upload rights that I didn't put my name in the >> Uploaders fields. Anyway I don't care either way, so if it's less >>

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi Guilhem > >I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses? (Yes >I read section 3.3 of the policy, it didn't help me understanding.) for two reasons, don't make people upset, and because he is a DD :) >GPL vs MIT is not my choice, as debian/initramfs/* was originally

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi! Thanks for your interest. And generally for your mentoring work :-) On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 12:11:54 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses? >> (Yes I read section 3.3 of the policy, it didn't help me >> understanding.) > >

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi again, >Making people upset was certainly not my intention. And it's precisely >because I don't have upload rights that I didn't put my name in the >Uploaders fields. Anyway I don't care either way, so if it's less >controversial to swap the addresses I'll do that. I guess maintainer is a

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 at 15:03:16 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > +Maintainer: Guilhem Moulin > +Uploaders: Gerrit Pape , > > I would do the opposite, but well, as you wish :) I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses?

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi Helmut, Gerrit gave him permission to comaintain, do you want to followup with the review? I can do a review in the next 2-3 days if needed, cheers, G. Il Domenica 20 Settembre 2015 14:45, Guilhem Moulin ha scritto: Hi Helmut & Gianfranco, By the way if you don't

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Well, 5 minutes review: 1)control: a) +Maintainer: Guilhem Moulin +Uploaders: Gerrit Pape , I would do the opposite, but well, as you wish :) b) dh-autoreconf, autoconf, automake (>= 1:1.12) I think dh-autoreconf is already enough, but please double

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi Helmut & Gianfranco, By the way if you don't have time or are no longer interested in sponsoring this upload (which is no longer an NMU by the way) please just say it out loud so I can poke debian-mentors@l.d.o again :-) Thanks! Cheers, -- Guilhem. signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Control: title -1 RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client Hi Gerrit & al., On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 at 12:19:39 +, Gerrit Pape wrote: > Comaintenance is fine too. Awesome, thanks! I've therefore removed the NMU annotations and uploaded 2015.68-1 to m.d.n: dget -x