On 2015-07-01 17:59, Chris Lamb wrote:
gunicorn as well ... with the same versioning since it was split off
from gunicorn
gunicorn should B+R gunicorn ( blah)? You've got me confused now. :)
That sentence was meant to be read like
[python-gunicorn needs to B+R] gunicorn as well ...
The versioning of the added B+R is incorrect, you want ( 19.0-3) since
that is the version where the package split was introduced.
And you are still missing Breaks+Replaces in python-unicorn.
Assuming you mean python-gunicorn here.. but which package is it meant
to Break Replace?
Control: found -1 19.0-5
The versioning of the added B+R is incorrect, you want ( 19.0-3) since
that is the version where the package split was introduced.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 2015-07-01 14:42, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
The versioning of the added B+R is incorrect, you want ( 19.0-3) since
that is the version where the package split was introduced.
And you are still missing Breaks+Replaces in python-unicorn.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2015-07-01 15:08, Chris Lamb wrote:
The versioning of the added B+R is incorrect, you want ( 19.0-3) since
that is the version where the package split was introduced.
And you are still missing Breaks+Replaces in python-unicorn.
Assuming you mean python-gunicorn here..
I should always
gunicorn as well ... with the same versioning since it was split off
from gunicorn
gunicorn should B+R gunicorn ( blah)? You've got me confused now. :)
Best,
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
--
To
6 matches
Mail list logo
