Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-20 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags 790988 + patch pending Control: forwarded 790988 https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/bullet_2.83.5+dfsg-2.html On 19/08/15 21:09, Julien Cristau wrote: > That previous SONAME bump made it to testing, I'd rather not have to > track bullet's new transition specially, that's going to be

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:53:04 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 19.08.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Simon McVittie: > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 at 13:04:27 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> I would like to request a transition for bullet due to a SONAME bump in > >> the latest version 2.83.5 as soon as G

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.08.2015 um 11:44 schrieb Simon McVittie: > On 19/08/15 09:53, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I wonder why we cannot just rebuild the library and request binNMU's for >> the small number of reverse-dependencies > > Take it up with the release team if you want to do this, but I suspect > the reason

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On 19/08/15 09:53, Markus Koschany wrote: > I wonder why we cannot just rebuild the library and request binNMU's for > the small number of reverse-dependencies Take it up with the release team if you want to do this, but I suspect the reasons why not will go something like this: * binNMUs can't h

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.08.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Simon McVittie: > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 at 13:04:27 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I would like to request a transition for bullet due to a SONAME bump in >> the latest version 2.83.5 as soon as GCC 5 is the new default. > > A version of 2.83.5 built with gcc 4 is in

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 at 13:04:27 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > I would like to request a transition for bullet due to a SONAME bump in > the latest version 2.83.5 as soon as GCC 5 is the new default. A version of 2.83.5 built with gcc 4 is in testing, and rdeps have already been built against it,

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-07-20 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Control: usertag -1 + transition Control: block -1 by 790756 Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 patch Hello release team, I would like to request a transition for bullet due to a SONAME bump in