On 11 August 2015 at 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:38:30 +0200, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> > No transition is needed, and as upstream I would really prefer no
> > transition is forced.
>
> As upstream why does the binary package name for the library matter to
> you?
Goo
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:38:30 +0200, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> On 3 July 2015 at 15:12, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the
> >library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the
> >library.
> >
> > - If there are no
On 3 July 2015 at 15:12, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the
>library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the
>library.
>
> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>maintainers decision if
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 13:12:43 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that
>most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need
>a rebuild too. You can find the log
4 matches
Mail list logo
