On 07/15/2015 06:30 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 15/07/2015 16:43, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 07/09/2015 11:35 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2015 18:24, James Page wrote:
I dug into this in a bit more detail today; the Ceph package builds a
number of difference loadable erasure co
On 15/07/2015 16:43, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 11:35 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/07/2015 18:24, James Page wrote:
>>> On 06/07/15 18:23, James Page wrote:
> The ceph Debian package git repository only contains very little
>> reasoning about the change. James can you
On 07/09/2015 11:35 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/2015 18:24, James Page wrote:
>> On 06/07/15 18:23, James Page wrote:
The ceph Debian package git repository only contains very little
> reasoning about the change. James can you please expand on this
> a bit? In general I wo
Hi Loic,
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 09:33:06 Loic Dachary wrote:
> :-) I suppose I would have reacted the same way as you just did if in your
> :position. Team work is key to everything and my words did not convey what
> :I meant, please excuse me. Being French, I sometime get lost in
> :translation.
Th
Hi Dmitry,
On 11/07/2015 00:35, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 23:48:32 Loic Dachary wrote:
>> It so happens that I don't have time to do team work on
>> this, hence my proposal to take over if the package was orphaned.
>
> No time for team work?!? Please enlighten us about your plans
On 07/07/2015 18:24, James Page wrote:
> On 06/07/15 18:23, James Page wrote:
>>> The ceph Debian package git repository only contains very little
reasoning about the change. James can you please expand on this
a bit? In general I would prefer to have changes like this in
their own
On 07/08/2015 04:13 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:57:41 Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Jerasure has been packaged for quite some
>> time now and no effort has been made to address these issues. Hence my
>> proposal to work on the packages if they were orphaned. Although I could
>> teach
On 07/07/2015 06:24 PM, James Page wrote:
> On 06/07/15 18:23, James Page wrote:
>>> The ceph Debian package git repository only contains very little
reasoning about the change. James can you please expand on this
a bit? In general I would prefer to have changes like this in
their ow
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:57:41 Loic Dachary wrote:
> Jerasure has been packaged for quite some
> time now and no effort has been made to address these issues. Hence my
> proposal to work on the packages if they were orphaned. Although I could
> teach Thomas or someone else how and why this should be d
severity 791445 normal
retitle 791445 Use system libjerasure with CPU optimizations
thanks
James Page writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/07/15 18:23, James Page wrote:
>>> The ceph Debian package git repository only contains very little
reasoning about the
Hi,
I'm co-maintainer of both jerasure and ceph. If the Debian jerasure package was
orphaned, I would be happy to step in and maintain it as a standalone package.
Jerasure was packaged without dialog with the jerasure upstream and I can
understand that keeping it in sync with what ceph needs is
11 matches
Mail list logo
