Justin B Rye wrote:
> Unfortunately, fixing it probably requires changes to the visible
> behaviour of the scripts that would mean changes to these debconf
> prompts, so we'll need to put this review on hold.
Ah - looks like the bug has been fixed:
Quoting Justin B Rye (justin.byam@gmail.com):
But why does it need a special script to install a package? (Goes and
looks...) Yipe! It just checks I'm root and then runs
dpkg -i /tmp/publicfile-installer/publicfile*_*.deb
Does the build really leave its output in a predictable
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Justin B Rye (justin.byam@gmail.com):
But why does it need a special script to install a package? (Goes and
looks...) Yipe! It just checks I'm root and then runs
dpkg -i /tmp/publicfile-installer/publicfile*_*.deb
Does the build really leave its
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for
the publicfile-installer source package.
This review will last from Saturday, August 08, 2015 to Tuesday, August 18,
2015.
Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original
files. Comments about your
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Rationale:
--- publicfile-installer.old/debian/templates 2015-07-29 08:21:48.490182705
+0200
+++ publicfile-installer/debian/templates 2015-07-29 13:44:58.140605903
+0200
@@ -1,13 +1,16 @@
Template: publicfile-installer/build
Type: boolean
Default: false
5 matches
Mail list logo
