Bug#795475: Make the "tor" AppArmor abstraction extensible by other packages

2017-07-07 Thread intrigeri
Peter Palfrader: > Is this still something we want to do? Yes, I think it would be a valuable improvement :) Cheers, -- intrigeri

Bug#795475: Make the "tor" AppArmor abstraction extensible by other packages

2017-07-07 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hello intri! On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > > > To fix this, I propose that we: > > > > a) add "#include tor.d" to abstractions/tor > > b) move each already present PT-related rules from abstractions/tor to > >

Bug#795475: Make the "tor" AppArmor abstraction extensible by other packages

2015-10-19 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > To fix this, I propose that we: > > a) add "#include tor.d" to abstractions/tor > b) move each already present PT-related rules from abstractions/tor to >abstractions/tor.d/, that would be shipped in the corresponding >PT package. > >

Bug#795475: Make the "tor" AppArmor abstraction extensible by other packages

2015-09-15 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrig...@debian.org wrote (14 Aug 2015 11:02:44 GMT) : > Sounds good? Any foreseeable issue with it? Better ideas? Ping? Cheers, -- intrigeri

Bug#795475: Make the tor AppArmor abstraction extensible by other packages

2015-08-14 Thread intrigeri
Package: tor Version: 0.2.6.10-1 Severity: wishlist Owner: intrig...@debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: lu...@debian.org Hi, a common source of problems with little-t-tor's AppArmor confinement has been the hard-coded list of pluggable transports in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/tor: whenever someone