Peter Palfrader:
> Is this still something we want to do?
Yes, I think it would be a valuable improvement :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hello intri!
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
>
> > To fix this, I propose that we:
> >
> > a) add "#include tor.d" to abstractions/tor
> > b) move each already present PT-related rules from abstractions/tor to
> >abstractions/to
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> To fix this, I propose that we:
>
> a) add "#include tor.d" to abstractions/tor
> b) move each already present PT-related rules from abstractions/tor to
>abstractions/tor.d/, that would be shipped in the corresponding
>PT package.
>
> I'
Hi,
intrig...@debian.org wrote (14 Aug 2015 11:02:44 GMT) :
> Sounds good? Any foreseeable issue with it? Better ideas?
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Package: tor
Version: 0.2.6.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Owner: intrig...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: lu...@debian.org
Hi,
a common source of problems with little-t-tor's AppArmor confinement
has been the hard-coded list of pluggable transports in
/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/tor: whenever someone create
5 matches
Mail list logo