This is a friendly ping wrt the libstdc++ ABI transition. Your package is listed
as needing a transition but has seen no action. It'd be good to get things going
so we can finish the transition soon.
Cheers,
Emilio
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:45:06PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> They already left testing, in fact. This RC bug is partly to stop them
> getting back in until after the necessary rename (or new upstream
> SONAME) has happened.
Ok, perfect.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico
On 11/09/15 21:35, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Would it be possible to just remove wreport and dballe from testing, so
> that no transition will be blocked, and have them move in again when I
> upload the new ones?
They already left testing, in fact. This RC bug is partly to stop them
getting back in unt
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 08:49:55PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Looking at the build-dependencies of wreport, the only C++ library
> seems to be libwibble, which is static (and was already rebuilt).
> So this sub-transition is ready to start.
>
> The package might be NMU'd if there is no mainta
Source: wreport
Version: 2.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks ABI without a package rename
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11
Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break exi
5 matches
Mail list logo
