Hi Sébastien
On 16 September 2015 at 22:47, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> It builds, but I am not sure it works.
I wrote the attached test program and built openspecfun on amd64,
armhf and ppc64el.
All versions output the same results.
> There is some low level stuff in
> the rem_pio2/ directory.
Benefit of targeting any arch instead of known succesful ones is to help
porters identify where work is needed - a.k.a. not hide problems, as
we're all abiding to in our Social Contract.
You need not be concerned about FTBFS on strange archs affecting the
package migrating to testing: Only FTBF
Le jeudi 17 septembre 2015 à 18:36 +0200, Graham Inggs a écrit :
> On 17/09/2015 17:38, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > I don't understand why this would be better. It seems to me that it
> > would just eat buildd resources, with no clear benefit… Or am I
> > missing
> > something?
>
> In my opinio
I would be ok with that too. The rem_pio2 is just thrown in there for
convenience - it should be removed eventually.
-viral
> On 17-Sep-2015, at 10:06 pm, Graham Inggs wrote:
>
> On 17/09/2015 17:38, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> I don't understand why this would be better. It seems to me tha
On 17/09/2015 17:38, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
I don't understand why this would be better. It seems to me that it
would just eat buildd resources, with no clear benefit… Or am I missing
something?
In my opinion, restricting architectures is hiding the problem.
In the case of openspecfun, it b
Le jeudi 17 septembre 2015 à 17:24 +0200, Graham Inggs a écrit :
> I think it would be better if the archs were not restricted and the
> package failed on the buildds.
I don't understand why this would be better. It seems to me that it
would just eat buildd resources, with no clear benefit… Or a
Hi Sébastien
On 16/09/2015 22:47, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
It builds, but I am not sure it works. There is some low level stuff in
the rem_pio2/ directory. For example, in rem_pio2/fpmath.h, there is
this comment: "Currently assumes Intel platform", followed by an
alternative that seems to assu
Yes, we should restrict. Arm should be possible shortly. We really should
move the rem_pio2 to Julia so that this restriction can be lifted.
-viral
On 17 Sep 2015 2:21 am, "Sébastien Villemot" wrote:
> Le mardi 15 septembre 2015 à 08:50 +0200, Graham Inggs a écrit :
> > Source: openspecfun
> > V
Le mardi 15 septembre 2015 à 08:50 +0200, Graham Inggs a écrit :
> Source: openspecfun
> Version: 0.4-1
> Please do not restrict openspecfun to i386 and amd64.
> It built on all architectures in Ubuntu [1].
It builds, but I am not sure it works. There is some low level stuff in
the rem_pio2/ dire
Source: openspecfun
Version: 0.4-1
Hi Maintainer
Please do not restrict openspecfun to i386 and amd64.
It built on all architectures in Ubuntu [1].
Regards
Graham
[1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openspecfun/0.4-1ubuntu1
10 matches
Mail list logo
