On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-05-22 23:20:33 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2015-09-20 15:52:34 [-0400], Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > > This could be a problem
On 2016-05-22 23:20:33 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2015-09-20 15:52:34 [-0400], Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > This could be a problem with the include paths for the standard
> > > library. Examining features.h and wha
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2015-09-20 15:52:34 [-0400], Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > This could be a problem with the include paths for the standard
> > library. Examining features.h and what's going on around the cdefs.h
> > include:
>
> Jeffrey,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>
>> # find /usr -name cdefs.h
>> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnux32/sys/cdefs.h
>
> If you want to show include directories, you should show cpp -v,
> not gcc -v. But it's obvious
> Why are you reporting something about the upstream source to
> Debian while the Debian package build fine? It has an debian-x32
> target that uses -mx32.
>
Debian wants all bugs reported to them, and not upstream. See "Don't
file bugs upstream" at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.
Jeff
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> # find /usr -name cdefs.h
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnux32/sys/cdefs.h
If you want to show include directories, you should show cpp -v,
not gcc -v. But it's obvious why this doesn't work since you're
telling it to build for am
6 matches
Mail list logo
