Bug#799899: rapidjson: Please upgrade to 1.0.2

2017-01-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:12:26AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > What's the status of 1.0 or 1.1? Are we still waiting on reverse dependencies > to support 1.0? Yes. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF/issues/417. Doesn't look like it's fixed. But even if it was fixed now, that new

Bug#799899: rapidjson: Please upgrade to 1.0.2

2017-01-19 Thread Olaf van der Spek
Package: rapidjson-dev Version: 0.12~git20141031+dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #799899 Hi, What's the status of 1.0 or 1.1? Are we still waiting on reverse dependencies to support 1.0? It'd be nice to have a newer version in Stretch.. Gr, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT

Bug#799899: rapidjson: Please upgrade to 1.0.2

2015-09-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:57:09PM +0300, Andriy Senkovych wrote: > The project has moved to CMake build system with Debian maintainers in mind so > I hope there is small effort needed to package it now. Actually cmake is a hughe effort as it ignores CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX and insists on /usr.. And

Bug#799899: rapidjson: Please upgrade to 1.0.2

2015-09-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:57:09PM +0300, Andriy Senkovych wrote: > > The project has moved to CMake build system with Debian maintainers in mind > > so > > I hope there is small effort needed to package it now. > > Actually cmake

Bug#799899: rapidjson: Please upgrade to 1.0.2

2015-09-23 Thread Andriy Senkovych
Source: rapidjson Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Please consider upgrading package to the last release v1.0.2 from May 14, 2015. The project has moved to CMake build system with Debian maintainers in mind so I hope there is small effort needed to package it now. Thank you for your work in