On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 06:13:32PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > not only based on that, but way more importantly that this would change
> > *years* of existing practice.
> Could you clarify which 'existing practices' ?
how Debian packages behaved in the last decades.
--
cheers,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:54:22PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> btw, as pointed out on irc: I ment consensus, not consent. :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:36:02AM -0500, Marvin Renich wrote:
> > > I don't think there has been consent on the issue, thus I'm tagging it
> > > moreinfo.
>
hi,
btw, as pointed out on irc: I ment consensus, not consent. :)
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:36:02AM -0500, Marvin Renich wrote:
> > I don't think there has been consent on the issue, thus I'm tagging it
> > moreinfo.
> >
> > I'm also wondering whether to mark this bug as wontfix (until there
* Holger Levsen [230208 08:15]:
> control: tags -1 +moreinfo
> thanks
>
> hi,
>
> I don't think there has been consent on the issue, thus I'm tagging it
> moreinfo.
>
> I'm also wondering whether to mark this bug as wontfix (until there is
> consent) or to reassign to debian-policy or simply
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
thanks
hi,
I don't think there has been consent on the issue, thus I'm tagging it
moreinfo.
I'm also wondering whether to mark this bug as wontfix (until there is
consent) or to reassign to debian-policy or simply to close it.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
5 matches
Mail list logo
