Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2016-09-20 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 18/09/16 20:35, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sunday, September 18, 2016 10:51:16 AM CDT Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > but it is in conflict with the well-established standard way > of how libraries are distributed in Debian. This is incorrect. Header-only libraries are present in the Debian

Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2016-09-18 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sunday, September 18, 2016 10:51:16 AM CDT Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > but it is in conflict with the well-established standard way > > of how libraries are distributed in Debian. > > This is incorrect. Header-only libraries are present in the Debian > archive, such as libboost-dev or

Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2016-09-18 Thread j.wuttke
but it is in conflict with the well-established standard way of how libraries are distributed in Debian. This is incorrect. Header-only libraries are present in the Debian archive, such as libboost-dev or libeigen3-dev. A -dev package does not automatically have an accompanying shlib package.

Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2016-09-18 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
> There exists no corresponding library binary package libgtest1. Correct and for a good reason you mentioned below. > This is in accordance with a recommendation of the upstream authors, [...] > but it is in conflict with the well-established standard way > of how libraries are distributed in

Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2015-10-21 Thread Steve Robbins
I acknowledge that a header only library is uncommon. But I can't agree that it us a bug. Thus I don't believe a warning is required. And I certainly won't remove the package for this reason. Given that, can you restate what problem you encountered using the package? Thanks, Steve

Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2015-10-21 Thread Joachim Wuttke
Given that, can you restate what problem you encountered using the package? Somehow I discovered that there is a libgtest-dev in Debian, and a FindGTest in cmake. So I installed libgtest-dev on my system, removed ThirdParty/gtest from my project, changed CMakeList.txt files, tried to rebuild

Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2015-10-21 Thread Steve Robbins
Thanks. That is helpful. I'm not in a position to act on this right now. But you've given me several ideas for improvement. On October 21, 2015 7:26:29 PM GMT+05:30, Joachim Wuttke wrote: >> Given that, can you restate what problem you encountered using the

Bug#802587: at least, warn about absence of libgtest library package

2015-10-21 Thread Joachim Wuttke
Package: libgtest-dev Version: 1.7.0-4 There exists no corresponding library binary package libgtest1. This is in accordance with a recommendation of the upstream authors, https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/FAQ#Why_is_it_not_recommended_to_install_a_pre-compiled_copy_of_Goog, but it is