Bug#803480: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#803480: Bug#803480: marked as done (wine: arm/el/hf port ?)

Control: reopen -1 On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:29:54 -0500, Austin English wrote: > On Oct 31, 2015 3:15 PM, "Michael Gilbert" wrote: > > The submitter also mentioned armel. Should we support that? I guess > > the better question is if it's supported

Bug#803480: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#803480: marked as done (wine: arm/el/hf port ?)

> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:27:12 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> it seems wine can run on ARM: >> http://wiki.winehq.org/ARM >> >> "Wine on ARM already get's packaged by Maemo, Fedora and openSUSE." >> >> Wouldn't it be worth a shot ? > > It would indeed, and it's already been done: >

Bug#803480: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#803480: marked as done (wine: arm/el/hf port ?)

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:12:23 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:27:12 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> it seems wine can run on ARM: > >> http://wiki.winehq.org/ARM > >> > >> "Wine on ARM already get's packaged by Maemo, Fedora and openSUSE." > >> > >>

Bug#803480: marked as done (wine: arm/el/hf port ?)

Thanks Stephen. I just updated the mentioned wiki page (http://wiki.winehq.org/ARM), stating that it is packaged since 1.7.35. Greets jre

Bug#803480: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#803480: Bug#803480: marked as done (wine: arm/el/hf port ?)

On Oct 31, 2015 3:15 PM, "Michael Gilbert" wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:27:12 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> it seems wine can run on ARM: > >> http://wiki.winehq.org/ARM > >> > >> "Wine on ARM already get's packaged by Maemo, Fedora and openSUSE." > >> > >> Wouldn't it