On 09/12/15 19:30, Peter Colberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:51:15PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 08/12/15 16:54, Peter Colberg wrote:
>>> As an alternative to not having Julia 0.4 in Debian at all, would you
>>> agree to the Julia team reuploading the LLVM 3.3 package to unst
Le 09/12/2015 13:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 09/12/15 19:30, Peter Colberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:51:15PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 08/12/15 16:54, Peter Colberg wrote:
As an alternative to not having Julia 0.4 in Debian at all, would you
agre
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:51:15PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 08/12/15 16:54, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > As an alternative to not having Julia 0.4 in Debian at all, would you
> > agree to the Julia team reuploading the LLVM 3.3 package to unstable
> > under our maintainership?
>
> Sor
On 08/12/15 16:54, Peter Colberg wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:52:54AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Your package now build-depends on llvm-3.8 (as the first alternative). That
>> is
>> built from src:llvm-toolchain-snapshot, which means it won't migrate to
>> test
Hi Emilio,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:52:54AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Your package now build-depends on llvm-3.8 (as the first alternative). That is
> built from src:llvm-toolchain-snapshot, which means it won't migrate to
> testing,
> and thus your package won't either.
I was ful
Control: reopen -1
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 19:21:54 + Peter Colberg wrote:
> julia (0.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Imported Upstream version 0.4.2
>* Refresh patches.
>* Upload to unstable. (Closes: #803644)
Your package now build-depends on llvm-3.8 (as the first alterna
6 matches
Mail list logo
